18 Comments
User's avatar
Francesco Bruno-Bossio's avatar

I love your dedicated and true sounding work. It is a real inspiration. Anyone who takes the time and effort to fully grasp what you have to say and consider it should see a beautiful and strengthening intellectual picture. Fools merely cut you off from the beginning because they don't like that you are scratching festering wounds. From the United States, you are an eagle amongst the fowl!

aletheia's avatar

My Grandar did the equivalent of sticking his fingers in his ears and singing "la la la la la la, I can't hear you" when I got talking about Frankfurt School and the Beatles. Very funny.

A Bc's avatar

My jaw hit the floor as i listened to and read along to this. Great work, Sir!

Chris's avatar

Definitely going to look at Adorno and Beetles lyrics side by side.

In any case I like this as a declaration of intent. If you want to uproot people from a deranged state you need a proposition that is ganz andere and quite as deranging, so as to say ‘you need to look at where you are from wayyy over here’, ‘this is how wrong you are’.

Will Knowland's avatar

I don't know if Coleman is right, but it's interesting - especially with the Schoenberg connection.

Brad James's avatar

It's been common knowledge since he became famous that Bernie Taupin writes Elton John's lyrics. Psychedelics are also proving to be wonderful for treating mental health.

Brad James's avatar

The Age of Consent in the UK was 12, until 1875. The Age of Consent for homosexuality was 21 when it was legalised in 1967.

Alfred Kinsey had bisexual threesomes with his wife, but wasn't gay. These fringe freaks don't speak for the bulk of gay people, most gays don't have anything to do with the governing bodies of those organisations.

Will Knowland's avatar

12 meant pre-pubescent children were protected. The movements outlined in the article, by contrast, aimed at sexualising all children, including babies. Gay movements didn't choose age 21 themselves: they had it imposed on them.

'Beginning with childhood, Kinsey had lived with two shameful secrets: he was both a homosexual and a masochist.'

https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/style/longterm/books/chap1/alfredckinsey.htm

Whether or not all LGTBQ people see the logical implications of the premises they accept is irrelevant. What matters is the ideology - literally, the logic of the ideas. Dworkin and others thought it through to its conclusion.

Brad James's avatar

He was in the closet and strung his wife along with bi threesomes? Sounds like Philip Schofield! I still don't buy it about him being gay. I said it from the off.

These sociopathic people use organisations to push through their agendas and useful idiots pander to them.

User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jan 6, 2022
Comment deleted
Will Knowland's avatar

Define 'conspiracy' and explain why you think this is a 'supposed' one.

That picture was the frontpage of a German magazine. It's important context and evidence.

User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jan 6, 2022Edited
Comment deleted
Will Knowland's avatar

But the picture proves it's not nonsense, Aidan. Why can't you understand that?

And is the reason you don't want to define 'conspiracy' that it's your substitute for arguing when you can't?

Please calm down and proofread your pitiful spelling in future posts.

User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jan 6, 2022
Comment deleted
Will Knowland's avatar

Your comments are odd. The whole article is about how it's wrong to sexualise children, but you are claiming this is 'reactionary' and the facts outlined are a 'conspiracy'. You also claim the black lines don't do anything, but they mean their genitals aren't visible.

Ms. Markles's avatar

This is a depraved individual masquerading as an intellectual, best to leave them be.

Will Knowland's avatar

You mean Simone de Beauvoir?

Ms. Markles's avatar

No! Lol. The individual complaining about the picture. It seems to say more about them than your whole point.

User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jan 4, 2022
Comment deleted
Will Knowland's avatar

It's not the kind of thing you could easily find on Google - certainly not with a cursory search. What do you mean by 'compelling evidence'? Enough to convince a Beatles fanboy? I'm not sure anything could do that even though none of the Beatles could read or write music.

Whether Coleman is right doesn't affect the main point: the Beatles promoted a culture of free love and drugs. And they put a Satanist who ate his own excrement in a group called 'people we like'.

User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jan 4, 2022Edited
Comment deleted
Will Knowland's avatar

The Brazilian philosopher Olavo de Carvalho says the same thing as Dr Coleman.

Coleman's evidence is mentioned in the article: Michael Jackson buying their songs, plus the Schoenberg link.

Ultimately, Coleman could be wrong and my point about the Beatles is still true. They certainly advanced the Frankfurt School agenda.